This article was written by S Saravana Kumar and Annie Thomas.
This article was first published in Tax Guardian (Vol 10/No 2/2017/Q2), the official journal of the Chartered Tax Institute of Malaysia.
When we ordinarily refer to compliance in goods and services tax (“GST”), what strikes our minds is the filing of GST returns and settling the GST due within the stipulated taxable period. It has been more than two years now since the implementation of GST in Malaysia. The compliance rate for GST filing thus far has been high, with an average rating of above 95%.[1] However, when it comes to the settlement of GST dues, the compliance rate is not as high as the GST filing rate. It has been reported that about one-third of the companies audited by the Royal Malaysian Customs Department (“RMC”) submitted incorrect returns by omitting information, understating output tax or overstating input tax.[2] This kind of non-compliance undermines the government’s revenue, distorts competition as it gives the non-compliant business an advantage in the form of cash flow and compromises equity as this may encourage further non-compliance in other aspects of GST. This article[3] aims to highlight the other aspects of compliance requirement under the GST Act 2014 and the sanctions that the RMC may impose in such circumstances.
Customs’ experience
GST, or Value Added Tax (VAT) as it is known in some
countries, is regarded by economists as a fair and efficient tax system.[4]
It is a very effective tax as it places all businesses on a level playing
field. The popularity of this tax is evident from its implementation in over
150 countries, with even the income tax-free Gulf countries planning to
implement GST soon.[5] In
Malaysia, GST has been credited as having filled the government coffers during
this challenging economic period, with a projection of RM42 billion in
collection this year.[6]
RMC’s recent experiences show that the non-compliance culture
is prevalent among smaller businesses as this segment has a rate of 40% when it
comes to errors in GST returns. This phenomenon is not peculiar in Malaysia as
it is also prevalent in other advanced economies. Not only is there a
prevalence of incorrect returns, RMC has also noticed that the non-compliance
by small businesses commonly spans all spectrum of GST obligations. Some small
businesses are completely outside the GST system, some only register to
illicitly claim a refund; many have a poor record-keeping culture, which then
leads to poor filing and payment compliance. This is compounded further by
businesses that are ignorant of deadlines. Ninety-four per cent of the
GST-registered persons in Malaysia are from the small and medium-size
enterprise (SME) segment and inevitably, GST compliance cost is a challenge for
many SMEs. Meeting their GST obligations means additional costs for them,
especially in obtaining proper professional advice, employing competent finance
staff and investing in reliable GST software and ensuring proper GST compliance
return.
Why CBOS 3.0?
Some businesses regard that the compliance costs are high
and, in some instances, even outweighs the net amount input credit remitted,
which potentially leads to the failure to comply or register, thus allowing the
vicious shadow economy to prosper. This needs to be addressed as tax laws and
its implementation must be fair. This sense of awareness had led the RMC to
recently launch the Customs Blue Ocean Strategy (CBOS) Operation 3.0. The
objective of this operation is not merely to detect issues for further GST
audit or investigation, but to also encourage taxpayers to comply with the law.
The approach for this operation is “Informed Compliance” rather than “Enforced
Compliance” with the aim of assisting taxpayers, especially SMEs. Informed
compliance focuses on educating taxpayers by making friendly visits to traders
to explain and assist them in complying with GST obligations and provides
channels for taxpayers to share their grievances and enable them to provide
feedback. The RMC conducts handholding programmes and consultation sessions to
achieve this. On the other hand, the enforced compliance focuses on litigation
where errant taxpayers will be prosecuted.
The core principle of the GST compliance model is to make
compliance as easy as possible. Having said that, taxpayers found to be
wilfully abusing or seeking to abuse the system will incur the wrath of the
full force of the law. In this context, the ongoing CBOS operation has three
levels:
(i) Verification;
(ii) 30 days to comply;
(iii) Enforcement action.
Via the verification exercise, the RMC will examine the GST
treatment adopted by businesses and the corresponding business documentations.
If any non-compliance is detected, then the affected taxpayer will be advised
to amend the GST-03 return and settle the amount of GST due within 30 days. If
the taxpayer fails to amend the GST- 03 return and/or settle the amount due
within 30 days, then a full GST audit will be conducted and enforcement actions
such as prosecution, civil proceedings to recover the amount due, garnishing of
assets, imposition of travel restriction and recovery proceedings against
directors will be employed. Hence, the RMC encourages voluntary compliance with
taxpayers coming forward to correct their previous mistakes. From the RMC’s
past experience, voluntary compliance can only be encouraged when taxpayers are
aware that non-compliance would be detected and sanctioned accordingly. Studies
have shown that taxpayers’ behaviour is strongly linked to the GONE (Greed,
Opportunity, Needs and Expectation of getting caught) theory. “Greed” refers to
excessive desirous of wealth or profit; “Opportunity” refers to being in the
right position to commit the offence; “Needs” refers to a condition in which something
necessary is required or wanted; and, finally, the “Expectation” of getting
caught refers to the degree of enforcement.
Below is the voluntary compliance model:
It is notable from past experiences that CBOS operations not
only collect additional GST revenue from noncompliant taxpayers, but also lead
to a higher declaration from taxpayers who are not audited.
Areas of risk detected in CBOS operation
Based on the RMC’s experience from previous CBOS operations,
these are the key issues that are usually detected:
- Incorrect treatment of standard-rated supplies as zero-rated supplies
- Failure to account for GST on non-trade income and fixed asset disposals (sale or trade-in)
- Reimbursement/disbursement
- Deemed supplies, e.g. provision of gifts
- Fringe benefits
- Claiming of input tax on “blocked” expenses
- Incorrect use of GST codes
- Incorrect decisions in setting up codes e.g. zero-rating based on billing address
- Incorrect entering of data
- Transposition or formula errors
- Failure to identify and take account of legislative or policy changes
- Poor communication of business changes (e.g. restructuring) to RMC audit team.
The above results in the RMC assessing each audit case on a
case-to-case basis in evaluating the type of action and sanction to be taken.
The common provisions of the GST Act 2014 usually applied by the RMC in
charting its course of action are:
- Section 9
Determine whether there is a supply of goods or services in Malaysia, including deemed supply and any importation of goods into Malaysia - Section 33
Ensure that a proper tax invoice is issued by all suppliers. - Section 36
Duty to keep full and true records in respect of all goods and services supplied, all goods imported and any other records required under the GST Act 2014. - Section 41
Furnishing return in the manner prescribed by law according to the time frame prescribed. - Section 88
Imposition of penalty for incorrect return which carries a fine not exceeding RM50,000, imprisonment not exceeding three years or both. There is also a penalty equal to the amount of GST undercharged. - Section 89
Imposition of penalty for GST evasion and fraud which carries for the first offence, a fine not less than 10 times and not more than 20 times of the GST amount evaded or defrauded, imprisonment not exceeding five years or both. For the second and subsequent offences, a fine not less than 20 times and not more than 40 times of the GST amount evaded or defrauded, imprisonment not exceeding seven years or both. - Section 90
Imposition of penalty for causing improper GST refund or entitlement to relief which carries a fine not exceeding RM50,000, imprisonment not exceeding three years or both. There is also a penalty equal to two times of the amount improperly refunded or entitled as a relief.
Recovery mechanisms
Despite best efforts, there will be a segment of taxpayers
who will continue to flaunt the law. While the RMC may not be able to
immediately detect all non-compliant behaviours, sooner or later, with the
concerted GST audit initiatives, taxpayers should act now before the long arm
of the law catches up with them.
The following are some recovery mechanisms
that the RMC may apply on recalcitrant taxpayers:
(a) Offsetting unpaid tax against refund[7]
In cases where a taxpayer has failed to pay
any amount of GST due and payable, the Director General of the RMC may offset
against the unpaid GST any amount GST refundable. The amount offset will be
treated as payment or part payment for the GST due.
(b) Recovery of GST as a civil debt[8]
Notwithstanding any appeal before the GST
Appeal Tribunal, the Minister of Finance may recover the unpaid GST as a civil
debt due to the government. In this type of proceedings, the production of a
certificate signed by the Director General of the RMC of the sum due shall be
conclusive evidence and authority for the court to give judgment for that
amount.
(c) Seizure of goods for the recovery of tax[9]
Any goods in excise control or customs
control or at the taxpayer’s place of business may be seized until the GST due
is settled. The Director General is also empowered to seize or sell any goods
belonging to the person liable.
(d) Power to collect tax from person owing money
to taxable person[10]
In instances where GST is due, the Director
General may, by notice in writing, require any person by whom any money is due,
accruing or may become due and payable to a taxable person who owes the GST, to
pay the said money which will be used to pay the GST due. This power can also
be used on any person who holds or may subsequently hold money for or on
account of the person who owes GST.
(e) Travel restriction[11]
Where the Director General has reason to
believe that a person is about or is likely to leave Malaysia without paying
the GST due, that person can be prevented from leaving unless and until the sum
owed is settled.
For the due compliance of the law and
protection of revenue, the Director General may require any person to give
security for the payment of any GST which may become due and payable from him.
Any imported goods can be withheld in the
customs control until the GST on those goods has been paid in full except.
In relation to a company that is being wound
up, where any GST is due, the directors shall together with the company be
jointly and severally liable for the sum due. The directors shall only be
liable where the assets of the company are insufficient to meet the amount due.
Conclusion
Hence, it is essential that businesses invest in their
workforce by ensuring their employees are provided regular training, which in
return will enable the employees to familiarise themselves with the GST law and
the updates. There should also be internal training or knowledge sharing
sessions to enable the transfer of GST knowledge and awareness within the
business.
Good training is hoped to result in good record-keeping
culture. Businesses have been reminded on many occasions to maintain complete
records and documents supporting GST documents. Transactions must also be
recorded on a timely basis and GST worksheets/ computations should be kept.
This must be supplemented with a reliable accounting system that enables
accurate.
Businesses must also adopt effective internal practices that
allow the management to identify exceptional transactions and identify the
appropriate GST treatment. It is good practice to implement a second level of
review and a periodic review of the above.
As much as the RMC is committed via the Informed Compliance
initiative to provide further assistance to businesses to ensure GST
compliance, leniency will not be extended to GST evaders.[15]
An estimated RM3 billion in GST arrears will be collected from the CBOS 3.0
operation by ensuring businesses achieve greater compliance. In the previous
year, about RM1.5 billion was collected through the CBOS 2.0 operation. RMC
aims to inspect about 200,000 of the 433,000 GST registered companies in the
CBOS 3.0 operation this year. As much as taxpayers who practise good GST compliance
culture should not face any concerns, taxpayers who have been dodging GST or
not complying with the timeline prescribed by law should come clean and make a
voluntary disclosure to the RMC in order to avoid hefty sanction.
About the authors
S Saravana Kumar (sks@lh-ag.com) is a partner with
the Tax, GST & Customs Practice at Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill.
He is described by clients as "extremely innovative in his interpretation
of laws" and is “committed, sound in knowledge, amiable and always well
prepared”. He regularly represents taxpayers on various direct and indirect tax
disputes before the Malaysian courts.
Annie Thomas is a Senior Assistant Director of
Customs with the GST Fraud Investigation Unit, Royal Malaysian Customs
Department. She was actively involved in the implementation of GST, providing
technical support and speaking at various GST training courses nationwide.
Annie has 10 years’ experience on indirect tax matters such as service tax,
sales tax, licence manufacturing warehouse and windfall profit levy. She is
also a Certified Financial Investigator (AMLATFA) and holds a BSc (Networking)
and MSc in Computer and Communication Engineering from Universiti Putra
Malaysia.
© 2017. LEE
HISHAMMUDDIN ALLEN & GLEDHILL. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
DISCLAIMER:
The views and opinions attributable to the authors or editors of this
publication are not to be imputed to the firm, Lee Hishammuddin Allen &
Gledhill. The contents are intended for general information only, and should
not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion.
The firm
bears no responsibility for any loss that might occur from reliance on
information contained in this publication. It is sent to you as a client of or
a person with whom Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill has professional
dealings. Please do not reproduce, transmit or distribute the contents therein
in any form, or by any means, without prior permission from the firm.
KDN PP 12853/07/2012 (030901)
[1] Statistic
from RMC based on the GST-03 return submission
[2] Kong
See Hoh, “Press Digest — One-third of GST-registered firms have problems with
new tax regime”, the Sun daily (13 September 2016) <http://www.thesundaily.my/news/1969371>
[3] Based
on the recently conducted GST & Customs Health Check from Legal &
Operational Perspective workshops by the authors for CTIM
[4] “GST
is fair taxation system: experts”, the Sun daily (27 October 2013) <http://www.thesundaily.my/news/866465>
[5] Stanley
Carvalho, “Gulf states prepare VAT laws ahead of introduction from 2018”,
Reuters (14 January 2016) <http://www.reuters.com/article/gulf-taxvat-idUSL8N14Y1Y520160114>
[6] Government
to collect RM42bil in GST this year”, The Star Online (9 January 2017) <http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2017/01/09/govt-to-collect-rm42bil-in-gst-this-year/>
[7] GST
Act 2014, s 45
[8] Ibid,
s 46
[9] Ibid,
s 47
[10] Ibid,
s 48
[11] Ibid,
s 49
[12] Ibid,
s 50
[13] Ibid,
s 52
[14] Ibid,
s 53
[15] “Customs
Dept issues 37,556 GST-related compounds”, The Star Online (8 March 2017) <http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2017/03/08/customs-dept-issues-37556-gst-related-compounds/>
Well written article. Worth a read
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThank You for the valuable information. Your content is quality and informative.
ReplyDeleteIf you want to Know about http://www.jilianconsultants.in/accounting-services-in-india/